A year of interoperability events at eHealth Exchange

Health and Wellness Informatics News

The health data network’s administrative director, Jay Nakashima, notices big improvement with 21st Century Cures Act compliance, labs, public health agencies, data exchange among providers, and data quality.

After more than 10 years of great effort and not a little annoyance at the slow speed of modification, interoperability has been creating some substantial improvement lately. This year has been an especially significant year for US efforts toward more seamless and widespread data flow, noted Jay Nakashima, administrative manager of eHealth Exchange.

The national trade, it’s really in all 50 provinces, is a system of networks. It connects private sector healthcare organizations and federal agencies for public health and care delivery.

eHealth Exchange has been improving on several other fronts. It is for the broader objectives of free-flowing action of health data across the ecosystem.

The COVID-19 general health crisis has been a main alert for the paucity of information exchange. eHealth Exchange has been operating to solve that through its effort with the Association of Public Health Laboratories. It has enabled the automatic end of COVID-19 warnings. It can get adaption to any infection for public health companies in all 50 provinces.

There has been a joint concentration in recent years to enhance healthcare data quality. It has become the necessity of supervision delivery.

The strongest interoperoberability initiatives won’t be important if the usefulness and quality of the data that’s shifting are substandard. Also, there have been many struggles on that beginning at eHealth Exchange too.

There is a terrible thing you can retain is for general health organizations. It is to obtain a chart of patients that are apparently corona positive. However, that list comes, and the general health organization tries to consume or upload that information into their system.

The system crashes because of the utilization of incorrect wording instead of utilizing a LOINC code to portray a positive Corona result. There was the utilization of homegrown working to clarify Covid-19 test results.


  • No comments yet.
  • Add a comment

    Join our Mailing list!

    Get all latest news, exclusive deals and updates.